Comments on: Wider Implications http://usa.worldcupblog.org/group-e/wider-implications.html World Cup 2010 - South Africa Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:20:15 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: ETucker http://usa.worldcupblog.org/group-e/wider-implications.html/comment-page-1#comment-4405 ETucker Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:54:42 +0000 http://usa.worldcupblog.org/group-e/wider-implications.html#comment-4405 Why can't Wahl or Galarcep (of ESPN) be announcers for games? I dont agree with them all the time, but they at least understand the American game and make good points. I think that a) Balboa and Wynalda are morons, and b) They agree on everything. I want to see conflict! Why can’t Wahl or Galarcep (of ESPN) be announcers for games?

I dont agree with them all the time, but they at least understand the American game and make good points.

I think that a) Balboa and Wynalda are morons, and b) They agree on everything.

I want to see conflict!

]]> By: Cajun Nick http://usa.worldcupblog.org/group-e/wider-implications.html/comment-page-1#comment-4338 Cajun Nick Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:42:39 +0000 http://usa.worldcupblog.org/group-e/wider-implications.html#comment-4338 I'd agree that if the US goes home without progressing from the group that it's time to look for Bruce's replacement before World Cup qualifying in 2008. I’d agree that if the US goes home without progressing from the group that it’s time to look for Bruce’s replacement before World Cup qualifying in 2008.

]]>