<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Down To 23rd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usa.worldcupblog.org/the-future/down-to-23rd.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usa.worldcupblog.org/the-future/down-to-23rd.html</link>
	<description>World Cup 2010 - South Africa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:21:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon E.</title>
		<link>http://usa.worldcupblog.org/the-future/down-to-23rd.html/comment-page-1#comment-10327</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usa.worldcupblog.org/the-future/down-to-23rd.html#comment-10327</guid>
		<description>Procedure change nothwithstanding, the FIFA rankings remain nearly as odd as ever.  We probably should be somewhere around 23rd, but I think that&#039;s mostly the stopped clock being right twice a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Procedure change nothwithstanding, the FIFA rankings remain nearly as odd as ever.  We probably should be somewhere around 23rd, but I think that&#8217;s mostly the stopped clock being right twice a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://usa.worldcupblog.org/the-future/down-to-23rd.html/comment-page-1#comment-10178</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usa.worldcupblog.org/the-future/down-to-23rd.html#comment-10178</guid>
		<description>Anyone that puts faith into FIFA rankings is fooling themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone that puts faith into FIFA rankings is fooling themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://usa.worldcupblog.org/the-future/down-to-23rd.html/comment-page-1#comment-9804</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usa.worldcupblog.org/the-future/down-to-23rd.html#comment-9804</guid>
		<description>This is a blessing in disguise.  We need to be more realistic, instead of seeing articles about #4 rankings (at least most of those had disclaimers about it, which was a start!) and how pleased we are with the Red Bulls getting beat only 4-1 by Barca.  The revised FIFA ranking procedure helps, but in any case it represents progress if US fans can see American soccer as others see it.  Low rankings ought to spur US soccer to get the blinkers off and try harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a blessing in disguise.  We need to be more realistic, instead of seeing articles about #4 rankings (at least most of those had disclaimers about it, which was a start!) and how pleased we are with the Red Bulls getting beat only 4-1 by Barca.  The revised FIFA ranking procedure helps, but in any case it represents progress if US fans can see American soccer as others see it.  Low rankings ought to spur US soccer to get the blinkers off and try harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
